MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123924818 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2032244

Self-Calibration of Biplanar Radiographic Images Through Geometric Spine Shape Descriptors

2009· article· en· W2123924818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionCalibrationComputer scienceVertebraSegmentationIterative reconstructionScoliosisRadiographyMathematicsMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel self-calibration method of an X-ray scene applied for the 3-D reconstruction of the scoliotic spine. Current calibration techniques either use a cumbersome calibration apparatus or depend on manually identified landmarks to determine the geometric configuration, thus limiting routine clinical evaluation. The proposed approach uses high-level information automatically extracted from biplanar X-rays to solve the radiographic scene parameters. We first present a segmentation method that takes into account the variable appearance and geometry of a scoliotic spine in order to isolate and extract the silhouettes of the anterior vertebral body. By incorporating prior anatomical information through a Bayesian formulation of the morphological distribution, a multiscale spine segmentation framework is proposed for scoliotic patients. An iterative nonlinear optimization procedure, integrating a 3-D visual hull reconstruction and geometrical torsion properties of the spine, is then applied to globally refine the geometrical parameters of the 3-D viewing scene and obtain the optimal 3-D reconstruction. An experimental comparison with data provided from reference synthetic models yields similar accuracy on the retroprojection of low-level primitives such as anatomical landmarks identified on each vertebra (2.2 mm). Results obtained from a clinical validation on 60 pairs of uncalibrated digitized X-rays of adolescents with scoliosis show that the 3-D reconstructions from the new system offer geometrically accurate models with insignificant differences for 3-D clinical indexes commonly used in the evaluation of spinal deformities. The reported experiments demonstrate a viable and accurate alternative to previous reconstruction techniques, offering the first automatic approach for routine 3-D clinical assessment in radiographic suites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it