MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123937269 · doi:10.1002/polb.23908

Design of thermal hybrid composites based on liquid crystal polymer and hexagonal boron nitride fiber network in polylactide matrix

2015· article· en· W2123937269 on OpenAlexaff
Shahriar Ghaffari Mosanenzadeh, Min Wen Liu, Hugo G. Palhares, Hani E. Naguib

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialBoron nitrideThermal conductivityFiller (materials)FiberHexagonal boron nitridePolymerElectrical conductorGrapheneNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development of high thermally conductive and electrically insulative composites is of interest for electronic packaging industry. Advancements in smaller and more compact electronic devices required improvements in packing materials, including their weight, thermal conductivity, and electrical resistivity. In addition, with the increasing environmental awareness, the usage of green (bio-based) alternatives was equally important. In the present study a hybrid based on fibers of highly concentrated hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) in liquid crystal polymer (LCP) matrix were fabricated. These hybrids were formed by arranging hBN platelets into LCP fiber form to reach high filler concentration and then randomly mix it in polylactide (PLA) matrix. With appropriate filler interaction within the hybrid, thermal conductivity similar to that of pure fiber could be achieved. Filler interaction may be tailored by optimizing the fibers aspect ratio. This study demonstrated the effect of random fillers in fibers shape in increasing the overall thermal conductivity of PLA polymeric hybrid using hBN and LCP fibers. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2016, 54, 457–464

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer PhysicsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207