MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123952581 · doi:10.1109/vetecf.2003.1285068

Iterative trellis search detection for asynchronous MIMO systems

2003· article· en· W2123952581 on OpenAlexafffund
Y.L.C. de Jong, T.J. Willink

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
FundersMinistère de la Défense NationaleDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsAsynchronous communicationMIMOComputer scienceDetectorTrellis (graph)AlgorithmQuadrature amplitude modulationTurbo codeQAMBit error rateElectronic engineeringReal-time computingDecoding methodsTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a reduced-complexity soft-input soft-output detection scheme for asynchronous space-time bit-interleaved coded modulation (ST-BICM) MIMO systems. This scheme is referred to as asynchronous iterative trellis search (A-ITS) detection. The A-ITS detector is based in part on a reduced-state approximation of the BCJR algorithm, and also uses a special type of bit mapping called multilevel mapping to reduce complexity for high-order QAM modulation schemes. The complexity per bit of the detector is linear in the number of transmit antennas and roughly independent of the signal constellation size. The paper presents error performance results generated from computer simulations of an asynchronous iterative ("turbo") MIMO receiver employing the A-ITS detector. It is demonstrated that allowing transmissions from different antennas to be asynchronous can result in considerable performance improvement compared to synchronous MIMO systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207