MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123958848 · doi:10.1109/pes.2006.1709255

Nonlinear state space modeling of a variable speed wind power generation system

2006· article· en· W2123958848 on OpenAlexaff
Sayyed Hossein Edjtahed, M. Karrari, William Rosehart, A.A. Ali

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)State spaceState-space representationVariable (mathematics)State variableComputer scienceWind powerRepresentation (politics)Wind speedTrajectoryLinear modelMathematicsEngineeringControl (management)AlgorithmPhysicsArtificial intelligenceMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New problems emerging from the increased production of power from renewable resources are becoming a good challenge. To face the new challenges, accurate modeling of such systems is required. For example, to be able to apply advanced control strategies, usually a linearized state space representation of the system is needed. Taking a variable speed cage machine wind generation system as the case study, in this paper a nonlinear state space model is developed first and then linearized. As the wind speed changes randomly, the parameters of the equivalent linear model also change to track these changes. Results of simulation studies show that the linearized model matches well with the original nonlinear state space model. The nonlinear and linear state space models derived in this paper can be used in the development of advanced control strategies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General MeetingSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207