MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124003647 · doi:10.1002/9783527671229.ch15

NHC Complexes of Main Group Elements: Novel Structures, Reactivity, and Catalytic Behavior

2014· other· en· W2124003647 on OpenAlexaff
Luke J. Murphy, Katherine N. Robertson, Jason D. Masuda, Jason A. C. Clyburne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicN-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDeprotonationTransmetalationNucleophileMain group elementLewis acids and basesGroup (periodic table)CatalysisLithium (medication)Reactivity (psychology)AdductEnantioselective synthesisElectrophileFrustrated Lewis pairCombinatorial chemistryReagentOrganic chemistryIonTransition metal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter focuses on structurally characterized main group element containing species that include at least one N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) ligand. These structures include adducts of simple Lewis acids as well as stabilized highly reactive main group molecules. Examples of catalysis are presented wherein the combination of both NHC and main group fragments are key to the observed behavior. The deprotonation of imidazolium ions as well as reductive processes has resulted in a convenient syntheses for a wide variety of substituted NHCs. Reported lithium salts of NHCs remain relatively few despite the fact that they offer potential to be effective and affordable transmetallation reagents. Compared to the heavier group 2 elements, the chemistry of beryllium with NHCs has been relatively unexplored. The Lewis acidic nature of many group 13 compounds makes them ideal candidates for complexation with nucleophilic NHCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicN-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207