MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124004779 · doi:10.1177/2325967113s00006

Hip Arthroscopy for FAI: Predictors of Patient Satisfaction and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty 5 to 7 years Following Arthroscopy

2013· article· en· W2124004779 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marc J. Philippon, Jack G. Skendzel, Mackenzie M. Herzog, Peter Goljan, Karen K. Briggs

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFemoroacetabular impingementHip arthroscopyWOMACSurgeryArthroscopyPatient satisfactionPigmented villonodular synovitisProspective cohort studyPhysical therapyOrthopedic surgeryRadiographyOsteoarthritisSynovitisArthritisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Hip arthroscopy is treatment method for patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). It is unclear what factors are associated with mid-term success. The purpose of this study is to report the clinical outcomes and the predictors of successful outcome at a minimum 5 years post-operatively. Methods: Between March 2005 and September 2006, 646 consecutive hip arthroscopies were performed. This study was IRB approved. Patients were included who underwent arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic FAI and chondrolabral dysfunction with radiographic and physical examination findings consistent with FAI. Exclusion criteria included patients < 18 years of age, professional athletes, labral reconstruction, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, and those with underlying hip disease such as pigmented villonodular synovitis or synovial chondromatosis. All data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed, including physical exam findings, radiographic measurements (alpha angle, the presence of a crossover sign or acetabular dysplasia, and joint space), re-operations or complications, and conversion to THA. Patients were evaluated pre- and post-operatively with a prospective subjective questionnaire. Primary outcome measure included the modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), and secondary outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Tegner activity scale, patient satisfaction, and conversion to THA. Results: Twenty-four patients were deceased or refused to participate at follow-up, and 284 patients(293 hips) met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 42 years(range, 18 to 77) and there were 140 females and 144 males. Sixty-eight hips (68 patients) required a total hip arthroplasty (THA) (24%). The average age of the THA group was 52 years (range, 32 to 77), with 60 patients (88%) over 40 years of age at the time of arthroscopy. There were 22 females (32%) and 46 males (68%). The average time to THA was 34.6 months post-operatively (range, 7 months to 5 years) and the average pre-operative MHHS was 58 (range, 24 to 100). Of the remaining 216 patients (225 hips), 171 patients (79%, or 178 hips) were available for follow up at a minimum of 5 years. The average follow-up was 6.6 years (range, 5 to 7.2). The MHHS improved from 61 to 80(p<0.001). The average WOMAC at follow-up was 9.0 and the median Tegner activity scale was 4.0. The median patient satisfaction with outcome was 9 (range, 1 to 10). There was no difference in the MHHS between patients who underwent labral debridement or labral repair(p=0.1). The significant multivariate predictors of increased post-operative patient satisfaction at follow-up were higher modified Harris Hip Scores (p=0.003) and not having a microfracture performed(p=0.015)(r 2 =0.2). Logistic regression modeling identified 2mm or less of joint space (P<0.0001, odds ratio=11.7, 95% CI: 3.6 to 38.1), hip requiring microfracure (o<0.0001, odds ratio=8.6, 95% CI:30. to 26.6) and age at surgery (p<0.0001) as significant independent, multivariate risk factors for conversion to THA. Conclusion: Hip arthroscopy for FAI and chondrolabral dysfunction results in a significant improvement in outcome measures with high patient satisfaction. Predictors of conversion to THA were age, 2mm or less of joint space, and having a microfracture. These results are from early generation hip arthroscopies and these predictors may be managed differently in current practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207