MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124015631 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.98

An Image-Reject Low-Noise Amplifier with Passive Q-Enhanced Notch Filters

2007· article· en· W2124015631 on OpenAlexafffund
Pranavi Anand, Leonid Belostotski, Kenneth A. Townsend, J.W. Haslett

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGovernment of AlbertaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsBand-stop filterImage responseBandwidth (computing)AmplifierLow-noise amplifierElectronic engineeringCenter frequencyComputer scienceNoise (video)Electrical engineeringLow-pass filterPhysicsBand-pass filterTelecommunicationsImage (mathematics)EngineeringRadio frequencyIntermediate frequencyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An image-reject low-noise amplifier with passive Q-enhanced notch filters in 0.18 mum CMOS is presented. Available IR-LNA designs employ a single notch filter to reject the precise image frequency and therefore require an additional automatic tuning circuit. This design achieves image-rejection over a bandwidth by using two series-connected passive notch filters, thereby relaxing the requirement of any additional tuning circuit. The proposed image-reject low noise amplifier has 16 dB gain at the signal frequency of 2.4 GHz and 58 dB rejection over a bandwidth of 100 MHz centered at the image frequency of 1.6 GHz. Noise Figure of 2.25 dB and P1dB of -13 dBm are obtained with bias current of 3.9 mA drawn from a 1.5 V power supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207