MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124034883 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.261

Microscopic Image Analysis and Recognition On Pathological Cells

2007· article· en· W2124034883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceSegmentationFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)RGB color modelComputer visionImage segmentationFeature extractionNucleusComputer scienceMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the features of the configuration and color information on the cancer cells, an adaptive automatic threshold segmentation based on the RGB and HIS color spaces is presented, which is available to segment suspected cancer cells and nucleus from the complex backgrounds in the microscopic images. The edges of the suspected cancer cells and nucleus are detected by using Canny operator. Using the technology of eight-chain code tracking, the feature values of suspected cancer cells are extracted. The feature values consists of the perimeter, the area, the height, the width, the circularity, the rectangularity, the extension and the area ratio between the nucleus and the cytolympth. Based on feature values, a two-round recognition scheme combined with morphologic and colourometry is proposed to recognize and classify the pathological and normal cells. The results show that the proposed algorithm can efficiently segment cell images and receive higher accuracy of cancer cell diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it