MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On Computation of MHD Flow Near a Rotating Disk

2002· article· en· W2124061627 on OpenAlexaff
P. D. Ariel

Bibliographic record

VenueZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminar flowDimensionless quantityMagnetohydrodynamicsMathematical analysisMathematicsBoundary value problemMagnetic fieldExact solutions in general relativityComputationPhysicsOrdinary differential equationMagnetic Reynolds numberMechanicsDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The steady laminar flow of an incompressible, viscous, electrically conducting fluid near a rotating disk in the presence of a transverse magnetic field has been computed. Using von Kármán transformation the equations of motion have been reduced to a boundary value problem (BVP) characterized by a dimensionless number m, which measures the relative importance of magnetic field. The solution is obtained in terms of series of exponentially decaying functions, the convergence of which improves as the value of m is increased. Also presented are (i) a perturbation solution valid for small m, (ii) an asymptotic solution valid for large m, and (iii) an approximate solution, based on stretching of the independent variable and minimization of the residuals of differential equations, which is valid for all values of m. A comparison has been made with the exact solution and appropriate conclusions drawn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und MechanikSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207