MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124069903 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2002.1134449

Testing the stationarity and normality of paediatric aspiration signals

2003· article· en· W2124069903 on OpenAlexafffund
Tom Chau, Michael J Casas, Glenn Berall, Dave Kenny

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsNormalityKurtosisAutocorrelationNormal distributionAmplitudeSkewnessVariance (accounting)MathematicsStatisticsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ninety-four aspiration signals were collected with a single-axis accelerometer placed infero-anterior to the thyroid notch from 23 children with Dysphagia. It was found that only 62% of aspiration signals can be considered stationary over short finite time windows. Further, 96% of aspiration signals violated normality to varying degrees. Nonstationarity was attributed to time-varying variance structure while departure from normality was linked to leptokurtic (more peaked than a normal distribution) amplitude distributions. Conventional assumptions of stationarity and normality do not simultaneously hold true for aspiration signals. Implications for automatic detection are mentioned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207