MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124077899 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.111.090373

Response and Long-Term Control of Bone Metastases After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with <sup>177</sup>Lu-Octreotate

2011· article· en· W2124077899 on OpenAlexaff
Samer Ezziddin, Amir Sabet, Florian Heinemann, Charlotte J. Yong‐Hing, Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar, Stefan Guhlke, Tobias Höller, Winfried A. Willinek, Christian Boy, Hans‐Jürgen Biersack

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
FundersErasmus Medisch Centrum
KeywordsRadionuclide therapyPeptide receptorNuclear medicineRadionuclideTerm (time)MedicineChemistryInternal medicineOncologyRadiochemistryReceptorPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an efficient treatment for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs), with outstanding overall response rates and survival. However, little is known about the particular efficacy regarding bone metastasis (BM). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive subgroup of 42 patients with BM of GEP NETs treated with PRRT ((177)Lu-octreotate, 4 intended cycles at 3 monthly intervals [10-14 wk]; mean activity per cycle, 8.1 GBq). Availability of restaging and outcome data was required for patient inclusion. Baseline characteristics, including age, tumor origin, performance score, Ki-67 index, tumor load, tumor uptake, plasma chromogranin A, and neuron-specific enolase, were analyzed regarding impact on tumor regression (modified M.D. Anderson criteria) and time to progression. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test at a significance level of P less than 0.05, and Cox proportional hazards model for uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 32 mo. The observed response of BMs consisted of complete remission in 2 (4.8%), partial remission in 14 (33.3%), minor response in 5 (11.9%), stable disease in 16 (38.1%), and progressive disease in 5 (11.9%) patients. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 35 mo (26-44, 95% confidence interval) and 51 mo (37-65, 95% confidence interval), respectively. Patients with responding BMs (complete remission, partial remission, or minor response) exhibited a trend toward better OS (median OS not reached after 53 mo) when compared to nonresponding patients (39 mo, P = 0.076). Only Ki-67 index (>10%) and chromogranin A level (>600 ng/mL) contributed to regression analysis. CONCLUSION: BM of GEP NETs is effectively controlled by PRRT, with long progression-free survival and OS. Poor patient condition and multifocality of BMs do not clearly affect treatment efficacy, possibly encouraging the use of PRRT in advanced bone metastatic disease. Larger studies are needed to assess predictors of treatment outcome in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207