MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124085729 · doi:10.1080/07060660509507235

The forcible discharge distance of ascospores of <i>Gibberella</i> zeae

2005· article· en· W2124085729 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David G. Schmale, Quinn A. Arntsen, Gary C. Bergstrom

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAscosporeGibberella zeaeSporeBiologyBotanyFusariumHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ascospores of Gibberella zeae are transported through the atmosphere to the spikes of wheat and barley and the silks of corn ears, where they may cause fusarium head blight and gibberella ear rot on susceptible cultivars. The first process in ascospores becoming airborne is the liberation or forcible discharge from perithecia. We measured the distance that ascospores of G. zeae were forcibly discharged in still air, and related this distance to the conditions necessary for transport into the atmosphere. Ascospores were discharged inside small glass chambers to distances ranging from <1 mm to nearly 10 mm away from culture surfaces. On average, ascospores from 6-day-old perithecia were discharged 4.6 mm, and those from 12-day-old perithecia, 3.9 mm. A large percentage of spores were discharged distances sufficient to surpass the laminar boundary layer of air that exists in the field during daylight hours. Since it takes less than about 3 s for a discharged ascospore of G. zeae to settle to the ground in still air, it is unlikely that a significant fraction of discharged spores surpass the laminar boundary layer and become airborne in conditions typically encountered at night. Quantitative spore-dispersal models pinpointing the timing and magnitude of ascospore release could potentially be used to estimate the relative risk of infection from local and more distant sources of inoculum of G. zeae. Keywords: Fusarium graminearumspore dispersalaerobiologyfungal sporeslaminar boundary layer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207