Dans la vallée d’Elah : masculinités, narrations et guerre en Irak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à analyser le filmDans la vallée d’Elahà partir d’une perspective théorique féministe de la sécurité internationale, afin de déceler les rapports de genre et de « race » qui sous-tendent la construction de différentes masculinités au sein des discours et des narrations sur la sécurité internationale, la guerre et la militarisation, notamment dans le contexte de la guerre en Irak et des productions culturelles s’y référant. En effet, si le film est critique de plusieurs aspects de la guerre en Irak, il est à se demander si ces critiques ont entraîné une véritable déconstruction des discours genrés et racisés qui légitiment et rendent possibles la militarisation et les guerres, ou si ceux-ci, même critiqués, sont reconduits par la narration du conflit. L’article soutient que la masculinité hégémonique du personnage principal est construite en opposition à une masculinité pervertie par la guerre en Irak chez les jeunes soldats y ayant combattu, limitant la critique à cette guerre spécifique et non à la guerre en général.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".