MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stressful major life events are associated with a higher frequency of cutaneous sensory symptoms: an empirical study of non‐clinical subjects

2004· article· en· W2124137477 on OpenAlexaffabout
MA Gupta, Aditya K. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyAudiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Psychological stress resulting from stressful major life events is known to exacerbate a wide range of skin disorders. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between stressful major life events and dermatological symptoms among a non-clinical sample. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community-based subjects from London, Ontario, Canada were recruited from the local university, schools and churches. PARTICIPANTS: Out of 600 consecutive, consenting volunteers 316 subjects [73 men and 243 women; age 38.7 +/- 14.8 (mean +/- SD) years; marital status 54% married; race 94%'white'] completed the survey for this study. The exclusion criterion was a history of a major dermatological or medical disorder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of major life events experienced over the previous 6 months measured using the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) of Holmes and Rahe, and the frequency and severity of a range of cutaneous symptoms ('burning', 'crawling sensation', 'tingling', 'pricking' or 'pins and needles', 'pain', 'tenderness' of skin, 'numbness', 'moderate to severe itching', and 'easy bruising') that the subject may have experienced over the previous month. RESULTS: The most frequently reported body region affected was the scalp (59.5%) and the most frequently reported symptom was itching (69.3%). The total number of major life events experienced over the previous 6 months correlated with the severity of the individual cutaneous symptoms (0.22 < or = Pearson r < or = 0.41, P < 0.001) and with the total cutaneous symptom severity score (sum of all cutaneous severity ratings) (Pearson r = 0.40, P < 0.001). This correlation remained significant after the possible confounding effect of psychological factors on cutaneous symptoms was partialled out statistically (partial r = 0.19, P = 0.001). DISCUSSION: We observed a direct correlation between the number of major life events experienced over the previous 6 months and cutaneous symptoms experienced over the previous 1 month by non-clinical subjects. The correlation remained significant after the effect of psychological factors was partialled out, suggesting that this relationship holds even if the subject does not acknowledge psychological distress in reaction to the major life event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207