Dialogue- Assimilation- Subversion Contemporary New Media Native Art in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
But we are the river, the crossings continue throughout, through the blood and the bone, voices calling from each side. Ahasiw Maskegon-Iskwew, åsowaha2 In 1992, Salish/Okanagan artist Lawrence Paul Yuxweluptun presented a virtual reality installation Inherent Rights, Vision Right, at Land, Spirit, Power, a show organized by the National Gallery of Canada during the celebrations of Canada’s 125th birthday.3 The work consisted of an electronic mask and an electronic-motion hand and was aimed at introducing the viewer to the artist’s religious practices: I have been a Blackface dancer eighteen years now, a masked dancer, a Sxwayxwey dancer since I was fourteen. I have been able to draw from these native experiences, combining them with western world experiences and technology to make my work. Employing technology that in the past has been used against native people.4 It is this evocation of the dialogue between Aboriginal5 stories and Western technologies,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.049 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".