MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124171619 · doi:10.1080/13547500600733622

Comparison of the urinary excretion time courses of pyrene-1,6-dione, pyrene-1,8-dione and 1-hydroxypyrene in rats intravenously exposed to pyrene

2006· article· en· W2124171619 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ruzgyte, Michèle Bouchard, C. Viau

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomarkers · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecUniversité de Montréal
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational University of Singapore
KeywordsPyreneUrineChemistryExcretionHigh-performance liquid chromatographyChromatographyBenzo(a)pyreneDerivatizationUrinary systemEndocrinologyBiochemistryOrganic chemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The urinary excretion time courses of pyrene-1,6-dione (P16D), pyrene-1,8-dione (P18D) and 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) were compared in Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats. Groups of five male rats, of about 200 g of body weight, were injected intravenously with 0.05, 0.5, 5 and 50 micromol pyrene kg-1 of body weight. Urine was collected at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 42 and 48 h post-dosing. Pyrene metabolites were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/fluorescence after enzymatic hydrolysis of the glucurono- and sulfo-conjugates, extraction on Sep-Pak C18 cartridges and, for the analysis of dione metabolites, derivatization to stable diacetoxypyrene molecules. Over the 48-h sampling period, on average 17.4-25.6% of the injected pyrene was excreted overall as P16D, 6.4-8.8% as P18D and 0.6-0.8% as 1-OHP in the urine of Sprague-Dawley rats. By comparison, on average 10.3-14.7% of the intravenous pyrene dose was recovered as P16D, 4.8-6.4% as P18D and 0.3-0.4% as 1-OHP in the urine of Wistar rats. In both strains of rats there was no clear effect of the dose on the 0-48-h cumulative urinary excretion of P18D and 1-OHP over the entire dose range, while the percentage of dose recovered overall as P16D in urine at the highest dose (50 micromol kg-1) was statistically lower than at the other doses. The 0-48-h cumulative percentage of pyrene dose excreted as metabolites in the urine of Sprague-Dawley rats was also significantly higher than in Wistar rats (p<0.01) exposed under identical conditions. As for the urinary excretion-time courses of the different metabolites, for a given dose and strain of rats, excretion curves of P16D, P18D and 1-OHP generally evolved in parallel. There was also no clear effect of the dose on the excretion rate, thus half-life, of pyrene metabolites, except for P16D in Sprague-Dawley rats at the highest dose where elimination tended to be slower compared with the other doses (p<0.01). The average first-order elimination half-life of P16D, P18D and 1-OHP was 4.0, 5.7 and 4.1 h, respectively, in Sprague-Dawley rats, and 5.1, 6.1 and 5.1 h, respectively, in Wistar rats (all doses combined but excluding the highest dose for P16D). This study showed the relative importance of metabolic pathways leading to diones compared with 1-OHP. These dioxygenated metabolites appear to be interesting biomarkers of pyrene exposure at environmentally and occupationally relevant doses. Their adequacy as biomarkers of human exposure has yet to be confirmed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomarkersSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207