End of the Induction Period in Ordinary Portland Cement as Examined by High‐Resolution Scanning Electron Microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The early stages of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) hydration were studied by cold field emission scanning electron microscopy and isothermal conduction calorimetry. Particular attention was paid to samples from the end of the induction period, where an additional peak in the tricalcium silicate hydration reaction has recently been discovered. Higher resolution images were obtained than is possible with current in situ imaging techniques, allowing for the observation of features on the 5‐nm scale. The peak in the hydration at the end of the induction period was associated with both the formation of pores in the surface of the cement grains and the formation of nanoscale calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) structures on those surfaces. The effects of grinding of OPC and additions of tricalcium aluminate and tetracalcium aluminoferrite on the peak at the end of the induction period were also examined. The results of the study were compared with the models in the literature used to describe the causes of the induction period and its end.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".