MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124200229 · doi:10.1139/s07-022

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons emitted from a hot-mix drum, asphalt plant: study of the influence from use of recycled bitumen

2007· article· en· W2124200229 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anne Ventura, Agnès Jullien, P Moneron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphaltWaste managementEnvironmental scienceAsphalt pavementAggregate (composite)CombustionPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonService lifeEnvironmental chemistryChemistryEngineeringMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asphalt mixing is an industrial activity of which energy consumption can reach 60% of the total energy consumed by the construction and maintenance of a road over a 30-year service life. Hot mix asphalt plant represents the most common process found in the road sector. Hot bitumen fumes however contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds, and, moreover, the use of recycled bitumen can lead to generating various emissions. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons may also be emitted from the process itself, a step that requires warming and drying aggregate through combustion. In the aim of minimizing emissions, it has become necessary to identify the set of major influential parameters. A joint research program involving several institutions has been laid out to conduct an experimental campaign on the Blois Hot Mix Asphalt plant, with quantification of the 16 PAH listed by the USEPA. Variations in asphalt recycling rate favour emissions of heavy molecular weight PAH, among those analysed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicVehicle emissions and performanceFrench-language works237,207