Analytical methods for the design of 2-D circularly symmetric digital filters using McClellan transformation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analytical methods are developed for choosing the coefficients of the first-order McClellan transformation for the design of two-dimensional (2-D) circularly symmetric digital filters from one-dimensional digital filters. New, extremely simple formulas for finding the original and the scaling free coefficients are presented. They are derived by forcing the lower-order significant terms in the power series expansion of the linear error function to zero. Formulas are also derived for finding N-D McClellan's coefficients for the design of N-D approximately spherically symmetric digital filters. Many examples are provided to demonstrate the application of the formulas. The coefficients obtained approximate a circular contour with a higher degree of accuracy than the McClellan coefficients. The number of multiplications required to implement the designed filters is shown to be small. The formulas are very useful for real-time adaptive filter design and filtering by low-cost, stand-alone 2-D signal processors.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it