MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124227244 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2005.852778

Analysis and design of current probe transition from grounded coplanar to substrate integrated rectangular waveguides

2005· article· en· W2124227244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoplanar waveguideMicrostripBandwidth (computing)Insertion lossTransmission lineMaterials scienceElectric power transmissionFractional bandwidthOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringWaveguideOpticsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsMicrowavePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition between a grounded coplanar waveguide (GCPW) and a substrate integrated rectangular waveguide (SIRW) is investigated in this paper. The proposed scheme makes use of a current probe to transfer power between the two dissimilar transmission lines. A computer-aided-design-oriented analytical model is developed in order to optimize the geometrical dimensions of the transition. By using the GCPW instead of the microstrip line to interface the SIRW, substrate thickness can be increased without incurring a penalty due to transmission loss. Therefore, it is possible to achieve higher Q components. Experiments at 28 GHz show that an effective bandwidth of 10% can easily be obtained. The insertion loss is less than 0.73 dB over the bandwidth of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it