What is the respiratory retention of inhaled hexamethylene di-isocyanate?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isocyanates are a frequent cause of occupational asthma. Specific inhalation challenges are often required to confirm the diagnosis. The inhaled concentration has to be assessed during this procedure. However, the respiratory retention of di-isocyanate has not, to the authors knowledge, been evaluated in humans. The existence of a closed-circuit apparatus, designed to carry out these challenges, makes it possible to assess the dose. The respiratory retention of hexamethylene di-isocyanate (HDI) generated in vapour form, in both normal subjects (n=4) and subjects referred for the investigation of occupational asthma due to HDI in whom the diagnosis was excluded (n=5), was assessed. The latter group included four subjects with nonoccupational asthma. The HDI was generated at concentrations varying 5.1-15.2 ppb. The expired concentrations of HDI during such challenges varied 1.4-5.3 ppb. Therefore, the respiratory retention was 61-90%. To conclude, the majority of inhaled hexamethylene di-isocyanate vapour is retained within the airways and/on lung parenchyma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".