Les procédures orthographiques dans les productions écrites des jeunes enfants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude aborde l’acquisition de l’écriture selon des points de vue linguistique et psycholinguistique. Elle s’appuie sur l’analyse d’un corpus complémentaire de productions écrites et de commentaires métagraphiques de jeunes enfants de 4 à 7 ans. L’objectif est de montrer, à travers les différentes procédures déployées, en quoi l’acquisition de l’écriture du français résulte d’un compromis nécessaire entre deux principes : sémiographique et phonographique, et au-delà, comment elle s’inscrit dans une logique morphographique. L’analyse porte plus précisément sur les problèmes que les jeunes enfants rencontrent dans différentes tâches de production orthographique ou écritures inventées, et sur la manière dont ils parviennent progressivement à construire des savoirs complexes qui combinentces principes. Pour conclure, des pistes d’intervention didactiques sont suggérées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".