MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Morphologic Responses of Endothelium to Shear Stress: Reorganization of the Adherens Junction

2001· review· en· W2124298587 on OpenAlexaff
B. Lowell Langille

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocirculation · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdherens junctionCell biologyMechanotransductionCytoskeletonEndotheliumEndothelial stem cellBiologyCell adhesionStress fiberCell junctionSignal transductionCadherinCellFocal adhesionBiochemistryIn vitroEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shear stresses induce marked morphologic responses from endothelium which include alterations to cell shape and orientation and changes to cytoskeletal organization. These morphologic changes necessitate remodeling of cell-cell adhesion complexes that are important to control of endothelial cell physiology. Reorganization of endothelial adherens junctions has been characterized, and there are some data that pertain to the signaling pathways that regulate this reorganization. Shear-induced activation of Src, mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (ERK1/2 and p38), and PI 3'-kinase pathways are important candidate pathways, and there is evidence for a role for the Rho GTPases. Very little is known concerning shear-dependence of other junctional complexes, but available data indicates a high degree of shear sensitivity. Given the continuous changes in hemodynamics which occur physiologically in vivo, sensitivity of endothelial cell-cell adhesion complexes to shear will likely prove important to vascular pathophysiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocirculationSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207