Transmission Schemes for Two-User Linear Multi-Access Relay Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers multi-access relay networks (MARNs) where two single-antenna users communicate to one N-antenna receiver via two hops of transmissions through one R-antenna relay. Nodes in the network are under two linear constraints. The relay linearly maps its received signal to generate its forwarding signal without decoding; the receiver has linear decoding complexity in the number of users. Since the relay-receiver link has more transmission paths than the link from each user to the relay, a two-step protocol, called TDMA-ICRec, is proposed. In the first step, both users timeshare the user-relay link. Linear combining is then performed at the relay to maximize the signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) for each user. In the second step, the relay forwards both users' symbols concurrently to the receiver to enhance the transmission rate. At the receiver, an interference cancellation (IC) technique is used to decouple the users and ML decoding is conducted to recover each user's symbols. Two network scenarios are studied when the relay has two antennas and four antennas. Through analysis and simulation, when the receiver has more than two antennas, TDMA-ICRec achieves the same diversity as the full-TDMA-DSTC interference-free (int-free) scheme, yet with higher symbol rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".