Effects of gender, sire line, and penning environment on growth, carcass characteristics, and aspects of pork meat quality at different locations in the loin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One hundred and eighty crossbred pigs were used to determine the effects of gender, sire line (Duroc- or two Yorkshire-lines; all mated to Yorkshire sows), and penning environment on growth, carcass characteristics, and pork quality. Loins from all pigs were subdivided into cranial, grade site, and caudal portions to determine the effects of location along the longissimus muscle on pork quality. At approximately 25 kg BW, barrows and gilts were assigned to three penning environments based on feeder type/pig density treatments including FIRE feeder-low density, FIRE feeder-high density, and Conventional feeder-high density. Sire line by penning environment interactions (P < 0.02) were present for final BW, ADG, and days to market suggesting that both within and between breed performance are influenced by rearing environment. Sire line by site of longissimus muscle sampling interactions (P < 0.01) were present for muscle pH at 48 h postmortem, L*, drip loss, and IMF content. Line by site values for L* were ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".