MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124333148 · doi:10.1109/6046.845016

Automatic key video object plane selection using the shape information in the MPEG-4 compressed domain

2000· article· en· W2124333148 on OpenAlexaff
B. Erol, F. Kossentini

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Multimedia · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVideo trackingComputer visionMultiview Video CodingArtificial intelligenceVideo compression picture typesHausdorff distanceMPEG-4Block-matching algorithmDecoding methodsMotion compensationObject (grammar)Video processingCoding (social sciences)Data compressionAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Object-based video representation, such as the one suggested by the MPEG-4 standard, offers a framework that is better suited for object-based video indexing and retrieval. In such a framework, the concept of a "key frame" is replaced by that of a "key video object plane". In this paper, we propose a method for key video object plane selection using the shape information in the MPEG-4 compressed domain. The shape of the video object (VO) is approximated using the shape coding modes of I, P, and B video object planes (VOPs) without decoding the shape information in the MPEG-4 bit stream. Two popular shape distance measures, the Hamming and Hausdorff distance measures, are modified to measure the similarities between the approximated shapes of the video objects. Although they feature different computational and implementation complexity tradeoffs, the corresponding algorithms achieve essentially the same performance levels in selecting key video object planes that represent efficiently the salient content of the video objects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MultimediaSame topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207