MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124348009 · doi:10.3917/hsr.033.0159

Une retraite bien préparée

2010· article· fr· W2124348009 on OpenAlexaff
Ghislain Brunel

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire & Sociétés Rurales · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtEthnologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Ne pouvant plus s’assumer, le vieux vigneron Raoul le Picard passe en 1290 un contrat de placement chez un couple de voisins ; c’est un notaire très expérimenté de l’officialité épiscopale de Soissons qui se charge d’en rédiger les clauses et qui procède au recensement de l’ensemble du patrimoine paysan. Car en échange de la cession de tous ses biens mobiliers, de ses terres et de sa maison, le retraité recevra l’habillement, le vivre et le couvert jusqu’à sa mort. Mais comme Raoul est aussi homme de corps de l’abbaye aux moniales de Notre-Dame de Soissons, le couple qui l’accueille devra payer une taxe de mainmorte à son décès. Reflet d’une pratique méconnue, apparentée au système de la gouvernance étudié dans les villes du nord de la France, ce contrat jette un jour nouveau sur la fin de vie des vieux paysans et des vieux citadins qui ne pouvaient plus compter sur l’aide d’une famille ou d’un parent pour couler quelques jours heureux après une existence de labeur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1010.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire & Sociétés RuralesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207