MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124357374 · doi:10.1002/ceat.201200348

Multiphase reacting flow studies of bubble column ozonation reactor for water remediation

2012· article· en· W2124357374 on OpenAlexaff
M.L.N. Perdigoto, Faı̈çal Larachi, Rui M. Lopes

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering & Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
KeywordsVolume of fluid methodOzoneBubbleChemistrySurface tensionVolume (thermodynamics)Environmental remediationMultiphase flowMechanicsFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A multiphase Volume‐of‐fluid (VOF) model was developed to gain further insights into the reactive flow parameters and electrical capacitance tomography (ECT) measurements on the remediation of hazardous organic pollutants. Low ozone bubble frequencies were obtained for high surface tension fluids, and the liquid viscosity affected the ozone bubbling frequency. The VOF model indicated that the increase of inlet gas velocity enriched the ozone bubble detachment and concomitantly generated larger ozone bubbles, decreasing the detoxification rates. VOF mappings and ECT visualizations of gas‐liquid unveiled preferential routes and highlighted the attenuation of the axisymmetric behavior of the ozonation bubble column under high‐interaction regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering & TechnologySame topicFluid Dynamics and MixingFrench-language works237,207