MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124371785

Perception of Social and Environmental Problems by English and Mexican School Children

2001· article· en· W2124371785 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura Barraza

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of environmental education · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosPerceptionEnvironmental educationPsychologyEnvironmental pollutionSocial environmentOrder (exchange)Social psychologySociologySocial sciencePolitical sciencePedagogyGeographyEnvironmental protection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identifying children’s concerns about the world and the environmental situation can help orientate educational efforts in order to reinforce positive behaviours towards the environment. I describe Mexican and English school children’s (aged 7 to 9) perceptions of the world and environmental problems. I explore the extent to which culture and school ethos with regards to the environment are influential factors in children’s views of global and environmental problems. A close-ended questionnaire was given to children from eight schools with different ethos. Results reveal that, both English and Mexican children perceived war, pollution, and hunger as the three most important problems in the world. The school ethos was a determining factor that influenced children in their perception of social and environmental problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of environmental educationSame topicEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207