Investigation of the unstable attenuation exhibited by a chicken anaemia virus isolate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An attenuated chicken anaemia virus (CAV) isolate, cloned isolate 10, which was molecularly cloned from the Cuxhaven-1 CAV after 173 cell-culture passages, was shown previously to recover pathogenicity following 10 passages in young chicks. The consensus nucleotide sequence of the 'revertant' (Rev) virus, present as a tissue homogenate, differed from cloned isolate 10 at a single nucleotide residue (nucleotide 1739) that changed amino acid 287 of the capsid protein from alanine to aspartic acid. Subjecting Rev virus to 10 cell-culture passages reselected viruses with an alanine at this amino acid position. Experimental infections using a molecularly cloned Rev virus isolate demonstrated that the mutation at nucleotide 1739 was not in itself responsible for the recovery of pathogenicity exhibited by the Rev virus. Additional sequence analyses of cloned amplicons provided evidence that the Rev virus population comprised minor, genetically different subpopulations, and provided an indication of CAV's potential for genetic change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".