MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124395632 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353441

Strict 2-Surface Proximal Classification of Knee-joint Vibroarthrographic Signals

2007· article· en· W2124395632 on OpenAlexaff
Tingting Mu, Asoke K. Nandi, Rangaraj M. Rangayyan

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Classifier (UML)Nonlinear systemGaussianMathematicsRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceKernel (algebra)CombinatoricsBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Externally detected vibroarthrographic (VAG) signals contain information that can be used to characterize certain pathological aspects of the knee joint. To classify VAG signals as normal or abnormal, we propose to apply both the linear and nonlinear strict 2-surface proximal (S2SP) classifiers based on statistical parameters derived from VAG signals and selected by using a genetic algorithm (GA). A database of VAG signals of 89 human knee joints (51 normal and 38 abnormal) was studied. The classification performance of the linear S2SP classifier reached 0.82 in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (Az) and 74.2% in average classification accuracy with the leave-one-out (LOO) procedure. The classification performance of the nonlinear S2SP classifier reached 0.95 in Az value and 91.0% in average classification accuracy using the Gaussian kernel with the LOO procedure, and possessed good robustness around the selected kernel parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207