Tectonic Control on the Sequence Stratigraphy of Nonmarine Retroarc Foreland Basin Fills: Insights from the Upper Jurassic of Central Utah, U.S.A.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Continental successions of the North American Western Interior retroarc foreland basin provide an excellent opportunity to evaluate the tectonic controls on nonmarine sequence stratigraphy. The transition between the Upper Jurassic Brushy Basin Member anastomosed fluvial system of the Morrison Formation and the gravelly braided-river deposits of the Buckhorn Conglomerate has been studied to assess the dispersal of coarse clastics and the development of associated basin-wide unconformities in a sequence stratigraphic framework. The sharp contact between the two members is interpreted to be conformable based on stratigraphic, sedimentologic, and petrologic data collected at and near Cedar Mountain in central Utah, while a regional, mature paleosol at the top of the Buckhorn Conglomerate indicates the presence of a major sequence boundary. These interpretations are combined with paleoflow data and fluvial architectural analysis to reconstruct the evolution of the alluvial equilibrium profiles that controlled deposition of the succession. The Buckhorn Conglomerate is interpreted as an example of a post-orogenic deposit on the basis of (1) its tabular geometry, (2) distance from the contemporaneous thrust belt, (3) shift to transverse paleoflow direction from the preceding Brushy Basin axial drainage, (4) conformable lower contact, and (5) presence of an overlying sequence boundary with a westward-expanding hiatus eroding the coeval foredeep. The onset of a protracted period of low rate of orthogonal convergence between the Farallon and North American Plates resulted in tectonic quiescence and consequent isostatic rebound of the Middle to Late Jurassic thrust belt and the contiguous contemporaneous foredeep, as well as dynamic uplift. The ensuing basin-wide decrease in subsidence rate induced the progradation of the Buckhorn alluvial plain into the Morrison back-bulge depozone, and the subsequent generation of the overlying pedogenic unconformity, which separates the deposits of the Jurassic flexural event from the overlying Sevier tectonostratigraphic unit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".