MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124429398 · doi:10.1139/f09-185

Reduced hatchery rearing density increases social dominance, postrelease growth, and survival in brown trout (Salmo trutta)

2010· article· en· W2124429398 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sofia Brockmark, Jörgen I. Johnsson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas
KeywordsSalmoHatcheryBrown troutFisheryBiologyDominance (genetics)TroutHatchingRainbow troutSalmonidaeEcologyAnimal scienceFish hatcheryAquacultureFish farmingFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hatchery fish reared for conservation or supplementation often have difficulties adapting to natural conditions, resulting in poor performance in the wild. In a standard hatchery, fish are confined at high densities, which creates a social environment different from that experienced after release. Here we investigated how rearing density influences social dominance, postrelease growth, and survival in brown trout ( Salmo trutta ). Fish were reared at three density treatments: conventional hatchery density, half of conventional hatchery density, and natural density. Four months after hatching, dominance status was determined, and 36 fish from each treatment were released into an enclosed stream and recaptured after 36 days. Trout reared at natural density had higher dominance status and grew faster, both in the hatchery and in the natural stream, than trout from higher densities. Moreover, trout reared at natural density were twice as likely to survive in the stream as trout from higher densities. These novel results suggest that more natural rearing densities would facilitate the development of adaptive behaviour in hatchery salmonids and, thereby, their contribution to natural production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207