MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124435600 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1993.332380

Performance analysis of an in-band COFDM/FM digital audio broadcasting system

2002· article· en· W2124435600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital audio broadcastingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingDigital audioMultiplexingComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Digital broadcastingSound qualityBroadcasting (networking)Digital televisionTelecommunicationsFrequency-division multiplexingDigital radioDigital Video BroadcastingAudio signalElectronic engineeringMultimediaComputer networkEngineeringSpeech recognitionSpeech coding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few years, digital technologies have been growing in such a way that a new generation of fully digital audio broadcasting systems can now become cost effective. For this purpose coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (COFDM), a new transmission technique designed in Europe, seems promising. To avoid the allocation of a new bandwidth in the United-States, some groups are proposing the use of power multiplexing to transmit two different signals over the same bandwidth. The objective of this work is to analyze the feasibility of this system taking into account the CD-like quality level of digital audio broadcasting systems (DAB).< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207