Investigation of enzyme modified cheese production by two species of Aspergillus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enzymatic biotransformation of dairy protein and fat is the basis of most commercial cheese flavour ingredient processes; such products are commonly referred to as enzyme modified cheese (EMC). EMCs have approximately 15 - 30 times the flavor intensity of natural cheese. They are available as pastes or spray-dried powders. Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus niger are two kinds of molds that were used in this study for production of enzyme modified cheese. The results showed that A. niger and A. oryzae have lipase enzyme activities of about 43.3 and 10 U/g (U = 1 mol/min), respectively, while the proteolytic activity was 143 U/g for A. oryzea and 38 U/g for A. niger. The EMC produced using both A. oryzae and A. niger had the best score of flavor and odor after 3 days of storage; however the cheese produced by only A. oryzea had good flavor after this period of time and the cheese treated with A. niger only just had a strong odor. The results of this study showed that the mixture of A. oryzea and A. niger can be used to produce EMC in much shorter ripening period and with better flavor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".