Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The force-based seismic design procedure currently used assumes that the stiffness of the lateral force resisting elements is essentially independent of their strength. As a result, the period of the structure will remain the same as originally perceived, irrespective of how much the seismic base shear is reduced from the elastic strength. Current studies show that for a large class of reinforced concrete members such as piers, flexural walls and ductile moment resisting frames, their strength and stiffness are coupled. This leads to inconsistency between the assumed stiffness and the actual stiffness of the structure as designed. Using a wall structure as an example, this study examines the consequence of such inconsistency as it affects the estimation of ductility demand and seismic displacement of the structure, and points out the implication of continual use of the current force-based procedure. It is shown that the displace-ment-based procedure is a more simple approach to determine the seismic design strength of structures with stiffness-strength coupled elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".