MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124463538 · doi:10.1177/0893318912465070

Moving Forward

2012· article· en· W2124463538 on OpenAlexaff
James R. Barker

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement Communication Quarterly · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Relations and Crisis Communication
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWishReflection (computer programming)Transition (genetics)MoodMedia studiesPsychologySociologyPublic relationsTelecommunicationsPolitical scienceComputer scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

That bittersweet time has arrived for me to conclude my term as Management Communication Quarterly’s (MCQ) Editor-in-Chief. Yes, I am sad to let this wonderful role go; but the time is right for MCQ to move in its next direction. Transition points such as this provide opportunities for reflection and for looking forward, and I have certainly been in a reflective mood of late. For my farewell editorial, I wish to share with you my two most significant reflections as our journal moves forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.069
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.069
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0220.027
Open science0.0040.013
Research integrity0.0230.032
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1280.094

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement Communication QuarterlySame topicPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationFrench-language works237,207