MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124466726 · doi:10.1109/crv.2009.16

Non-Accidental Features for Gesture Spotting

2009· article· en· W2124466726 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Fourney, Richard Mann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccidentalGestureSpottingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMotion (physics)Computer visionMixture modelComponent (thermodynamics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we argue that gestures based on non-accidental motion features can be reliably detected amongst unconstrained background motion. Specifically, we demonstrate that humans can perform non-accidental motions with high accuracy, and that these trajectories can be extracted from video with sufficient accuracy to reliably distinguish them from the background motion. We demonstrate this by learning Gaussian mixture models of the features associated with gesture. Non-accidental features result in compact, heavily-weighted, mixture component distributions. We demonstrate reliable detection by using the mixture models to discriminate non-accidental features from the background.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207