Le rôle de l’aménagement du Saint-Laurent dans l’évolution de la cité de Cornwall (Ontario)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the beginning of the 19 th century, the growth of the city of Cornwall bas taken place by spurts, which were connected either with periods of industrialization (1870-1890 and 1920-1930) or, more often, with the construction of canals along the St. Lawrence (1834-1848 and 1876-1908). Canalization work on the river, from 1954 to 1959, brought about to the city a new cyclical spurt, which was reflected in considerable prosperity and speculation during the period of construction, followed by a very distinct depression after 1959, which was made worse by the sudden shutdown of one of the major local plants. However, since 1962, the economic situation has been improving thanks to a new wave of industrialization. The consequence of canalization are no less significant from the standpoint of the organization of urban space. Before the work was carried out, Cornwall’s land use map was already very anarchical. The relocation of transport routes, which was made necessary by the creation of Lake St. Lawrence, has considerably aggravated compartmentalization of the urban space. On the other hand, by contributing to the city's administrative consolidation and to the establishment of its Master Plan, improvement of the river has opened new and more realistic prospects for the city's future growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".