MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124474047 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116662

New Galactic star clusters discovered in the VVV survey

2011· article· en· W2124474047 on OpenAlexaff
J. Borissova, C. Bonatto, R. Kurtev, J. R. A. Clarke, Fernanda Peñaloza, S. E. Sale, D. Minniti, J. Alonso-García, Étienne Artigau, R. H. Barbá, E. Bica, G. Baume, M. Catelan, A. N. Chenè, B. Dias, S. L. Folkes, D. Froebrich, D. Geisler, Richard de Grijs, M. M. Hanson, M. Hempel, V. D. Ivanov, M. S. N. Kumar, P. W. Lucas, F. Mauro, C. Moni Bidin, M. Rejkuba, R. K. Saito, Motohide Tamura, I. Toledo

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaFondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas PrioritariasScience and Technology Facilities CouncilMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorCentro de Astrofísica y Tecnologías AfinesEuropean Southern ObservatoryConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsPhotometry (optics)Open clusterMilky WayStar clusterAstronomyMetallicityBulgeStar formationGalactic CenterRed clumpGalaxyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. VISTA Variables in the Vía Láctea (VVV) is one of the six ESO Public Surveys operating on the new 4-m Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA). VVV is scanning the Milky Way bulge and an adjacent section of the disk, where star formation activity is high. One of the principal goals of the VVV Survey is to find new star clusters of differentages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207