Physiological and clinical effects of diurnal noninvasive ventilation in hypercapnic COPD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assess the clinical impact of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) on stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, changes in exercise capacity, dyspnoea and simple physiological parameters were evaluated. The time course of these effects during treatment and recovery was also assessed. Patients were randomly allocated to NIMV (n=27) or sham-NIMV (n=15), applied 3 h.day-1, 5 days a week, for 3 weeks. A 6-min walking distance (6MWD), arterial blood gases, spirometry, pattern of breathing, mouth occlusion pressure (P0.1), and respiratory system impedance (P0.1/tidal volume (VT)/inspiratory time (tI)) were measured weekly during treatment and 2 weekly during follow-up. Transition dyspnoea index (TDI) was also measured. During NIMV, carbon dioxide arterial tension decreased progressively, concomitantly with a slow deep pattern of breathing, a proportional increase in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the forced vital capacity and significant reductions of P0.1 and P0.1/VT/tI. The 6MWD improved by a mean of 76 m after NIMV, and by 73 m and 61 m 1 and 2 weeks, respectively, after treatment. Dyspnoea improved with a mean TDI of three points. Changes in 6MWD were highly related to TDI and to a lesser extent to changes in FEV1 (r=0.60). The current authors conclude that noninvasive mechanical ventilation has significant and sustained clinical impact in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".