MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124479510 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2006.874462

Linear Dynamic Models With Mixture of Experts Architecture for Recognition of Speech Under Additive Noise Conditions

2006· article· en· W2124479510 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeech recognitionFeature (linguistics)Noise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)Dynamic Bayesian networkSpeech processingKalman filterMixture modelLinear predictive codingSpeech enhancementBayesian probabilityArtificial intelligenceNoise reduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents a new approach to enhance speech feature estimation in the log spectral domain under noisy environments. A mixture of linear dynamic models with an architecture similar to the so-called mixture of experts (ME) is investigated to describe the clean speech feature distribution parametrically. Switching Kalman filters are adapted to the proposed model, and they estimate the clean speech components by means of a generalized pseudo-Bayesian (GPB) algorithm. Experimental results suggest that compared with previous methods, the proposed approach can be more powerful to compensate the noisy speech features for robust speech recognition

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it