MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2124494661 · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.5.956

Elevated Levels of Interleukin-6 in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Without Clinical Evidence of Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications

2001· letter· en· W2124494661 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Giovanni Targher, Luciano Zenari, Lorenzo Bertolini, Michele Muggeo, Giacomo Zoppini

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Care · 2001
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesInternal medicineType 1 diabetesDiabetic angiopathyEndocrinologyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The past decade has been characterized by growing interest in the idea that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease, and by the finding that serum levels of markers of inflammation can be used to predict the risk of cardiovascular events (1). Elevated concentrations of acute-phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and fibrinogen, are found in patients with acute coronary syndromes and are predictors of future risk in apparently healthy individuals (123). The inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a powerful inducer of the hepatic acute-phase response, and it has been proposed to be a central mediator in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease through a combination of autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine mechanisms (4). In fact, in a recent study, serum levels of IL-6 were predictive of the risk of myocardial infarction in apparently healthy individuals, and although the levels of IL-6 were strongly correlated with the levels of C-reactive protein, the association between IL-6 and the risk of myocardial infarction remained significant, even after …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Care→Same topicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases→French-language works237,207→