A new stratigraphic framework for the Upper Colorado Group (Cretaceous) in southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| September 01, 2003 A new stratigraphic framework for the Upper Colorado Group (Cretaceous) in southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada Karsten Schjødt Nielsen; Karsten Schjødt Nielsen Nexen Inc., 801 – 7th Ave. SW, Calgary, AB T2P 3P7 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Claudia J. Schröder-Adams; Claudia J. Schröder-Adams Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Dale A. Leckie Dale A. Leckie Nexen Inc., 801 – 7th Ave. SW, Calgary, AB T2P 3P7 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2003) 51 (3): 304–346. https://doi.org/10.2113/51.3.304 Article history received: 16 Jan 2003 accepted: 25 Jul 2003 first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Karsten Schjødt Nielsen, Claudia J. Schröder-Adams, Dale A. Leckie; A new stratigraphic framework for the Upper Colorado Group (Cretaceous) in southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2003;; 51 (3): 304–346. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/51.3.304 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract Extensive marine shales and shallow-marine sandstones of the Cretaceous Upper Colorado Group represent one of the last thick, informally named, stratigraphic intervals in the southern part of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Two regionally-mappable formations in southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan are introduced: The Carlile Formation (Turonian) overlying the Second White Specks Formation, and the Niobrara Formation (Coniacian–Santonian) underlying the Milk River Formation. Both names are extensions of lithologically-similar and laterally-equivalent strata in adjacent parts of the Interior Seaway in Canada and the United States. The boundary between the Carlile and Niobrara formations is recognized at a distinct zone (3 to 15 m thick) of 17 bentonites in the lower part of the Niobrara Formation, whereof two are argon-argon dated to 89.19 (± 0.51) and 89.40 (± 0.31).Regional variations in lithology, petrophysics and geochemistry of the two new formations make it possible to further subdivide these into formal subunits. The Carlile Formation is subdivided into the informal lower, middle and upper units. The Niobrara Formation is formally subdivided into three mappable members in ascending order: the shaly, non-calcareous Verger Member, the sandstone-rich Medicine Hat Member, and the shaly calcareous First White Specks Member.An outcrop reference section of the Carlile Formation is designated at Deer Creek (east of West Butte) in the Sweetgrass Hills of north-central Montana. The single core cut from the Carlile Formation in southern Alberta and southwestern Saskatchewan is located at 13-20-17-7W4 and includes twelve metres of the upper part of the formation. It is used as a reference section for the boundary between the Carlile and Niobrara formations. A reference core of the Niobrara Formation is located at 4-16-22-15W4, which also is designated as the type section of the Verger, Medicine Hat and First White Specks members. An outcrop section at the Ghost River Dam Spillway, west of Calgary, serves as the outcrop reference section for the Medicine Hat Member and is correlated to the subsurface using wireline logs and foraminiferal biostratigraphy. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".