MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124498492 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2007.4414078

Invariant feature set in convex hull for fast image registration

2007· article· en· W2124498492 on OpenAlexaff
Rashid Minhas, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvex hullMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionConvex setQuadrilateralDiagonalRegular polygonComputer scienceGeometryConvex optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract-In this paper, a novel feature set in images for registration is identified. Unique, geometrically invariant and easily extractable features in images called convex diagonal, convex quadrilateral are used for accurate image registration. Convex diagonals, convex quadrilaterals have attractive properties like easy extraction, geometric invariance and frequent occurrence. Coordinates, length and orientation information of corresponding convex diagonals in different images is used for initial transformation estimate. Corresponding convex hulls of scene objects are matched using Hausdorff distance as similarity measure operator. Coarse level estimate facilitates efficient, real time computation for final registration process. Initial transformation estimate based on convex diagonals, extracted from convex hull of scene objects, is refined using fine level image details to minimize errors originating from quantization and same convex hull information for different object shapes. The behavior of reference quadrilateral is robust against noise, outliers and broken edges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207