MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124509497 · doi:10.1177/0009922806290610

Plasma Glucose Concentrations in Profound Neonatal Hypoglycemia

2006· review· en· W2124509497 on OpenAlex
Arie L. Alkalay, Laura Flores‐Sarnat, Harvey B. Sarnat, Sergio J. Farber, Charles F. Simmons

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pediatrics · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoglycemiaMedicineIncidence (geometry)Plasma glucoseConfidence intervalNeonatal hypoglycemiaPopulationPediatricsAnesthesiaInternal medicineInsulinPregnancyGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study goal was to define low thresholds of plasma glucose concentrations that constitute profound hypoglycemia. Population analysis was performed on research publications on neonatal hypoglycemia ascertained by a Medline search. Eligible patients had neurological sequelae associated directly and primarily with hypoglycemia (profound hypoglycemia). Of 89 infants, more than 95% had plasma glucose levels of less than 25 mg/dL that were first detected at more than 10 hours of age. A breakdown of study patients according to those with or without neurological sequelae, who were exposed to a similar degree of hypoglycemia, showed a combined incidence of neurological injury of 21%, with 95% confidence interval from 14% to 27%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it