Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite de ce qui détermine les politiques de la culture. L’argument central est que les formes de culture résultent de l’expérience socialement construite – ce que j’appelle le substrat expérientiel de la culture – et que celui-ci voit le jour dans le contexte d’une existence sociale qui est elle-même reliée à des processus globaux. En abordant l’histoire du concept de culture dans ces termes, je montre que l’émergence des politiques identitaires depuis le milieu des années 1970 est en rapport avec ce processus plus large qu’est le déclin de l’hégémonie occidentale. De ce point de vue, les nouvelles politiques de la culture révèlent une véritable fragmentation politique et culturelle. Mais ce déclin constitue la base de la globalisation politico-économique et grâce à lui émergent des élites cosmopolites qui deviennent les hérauts du discours de globalisation. Ce discours fait à son tour partie de la polarisation de classe qui voit s’affirmer les nouvelles élites cosmopolites « hybrides » alors que s’éclipsent les pouvoirs locaux indigènes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".