MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124537597 · doi:10.7202/501245ar

Littérature de l’holocauste et éthique de la lecture

2005· article· fr· W2124537597 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Colin Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La littérature de l'holocauste pose problème à la critique éthique dans la mesure où celle-ci cherche le plus souvent à affirmer la pertinence des valeurs que l'holocauste remet en question. Cet article examine des textes de Charlotte Delbo, Elie Wiesel et Jorge Semprun qui suggèrent que la rencontre avec l'holocauste est impossible pour les survivants et leurs lecteurs ; l'événement est trop traumatisant pour être intégré à l'expérience du sujet et la connaissance qu'il offre est décrite comme inutile ou dangereuse. Enfin, la notion d'" enseignement " est empruntée à la pensée de Levinas pour esquisser une façon d'aborder la littérature de l'holocauste qui ne consisterait pas à se l'approprier du point de vue des valeurs du lecteur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littérairesSame topicPhilosophy, Ethics, and ExistentialismFrench-language works237,207