MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124541566 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383180

A Linear Programming Approach for Multiple Object Tracking

2007· article· en· W2124541566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationComputer scienceVideo trackingHeuristicsObject (grammar)Metric (unit)MethodConsistency (knowledge bases)Linear programming relaxationLinear programmingTracking (education)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsObject-oriented programming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a linear programming relaxation scheme for the class of multiple object tracking problems where the inter-object interaction metric is convex and the intra-object term quantifying object state continuity may use any metric. The proposed scheme models object tracking as a multi-path searching problem. It explicitly models track interaction, such as object spatial layout consistency or mutual occlusion, and optimizes multiple object tracks simultaneously. The proposed scheme does not rely on track initialization and complex heuristics. It has much less average complexity than previous efficient exhaustive search methods such as extended dynamic programming and is found to be able to find the global optimum with high probability. We have successfully applied the proposed method to multiple object tracking in video streams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations323
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGuidance and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207