MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124542169 · doi:10.1586/eog.11.30

The use of aromatase inhibitors in infertility and gynecology

2011· article· en· W2124542169 on OpenAlexaff
Jana Al-Shalati, Togas Tulandi

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAromataseMedicineEndometriosisControlled ovarian hyperstimulationEstrogenLetrozoleInfertilityGynecologyInternal medicineAntiestrogenAromatase inhibitorEndocrinologyTamoxifenPregnancyBiologyBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aromatase inhibitors act by blocking the aromatization of androgen to estrogen. Although the concentration of estrogen is decreased, they do not have the antiestrogen effect of clomiphene. This makes them ideal for ovulation induction and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Owing to their ability to decrease estrogen concentration, aromatase inhibitors could also be used for estrogen-dependent conditions including endometriosis, myoma and adenomyosis. In addition, they could be useful for stimulation of follicle development in women with estrogen-dependent neoplasia who wish to preserve their fertility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Obstetrics & GynecologySame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207